The Politics of Spatial Representations in Alahayude Penmakkal, Madhuratheruvu and Eri
Keywords:
Social space, topology, geology, third space, national imagination, sub-nationalismAbstract
Both theoreticians and critics have acknowledged the various ramifications of time in literary creations. However, until recently, space has remained an unexplored entity in literary discourse. The active role that space plays in the process of historical evolution has been overlooked by those who prioritize time as an active and dynamic agent of social change. Nevertheless, thanks to the insights of thinkers like Michel Foucault, Frederic Jameson, Henri Lefebvre, David Harvey, Edward Soja, and others, a “spatial turn” has occurred, prioritizing space over time in theoretical deliberations. Space has begun to be seen as a vital agent for social changes and historical events. The idea of physical space has given way to the notion of social space, where people and space are engaged in a constant dialogue to produce new meanings. Negotiating space as an organic form that plays crucial roles in people’s lives and histories has deep implications for the study of literature. This paper seeks to unravel how space acts as a matrix of meaning and memories in the production of social relations, functioning as a catalyst for the simultaneous production of power and resistance in the Malayalam novels, Alahayude Penmakkal (Sara Joseph), Madhuratheruvu (NadeemNowshad), and Eri (Pradeepan Pampirikkunnu).
References
Alexander, N. (2010). Imaginative Geographies: The Politics and Poetics of Space. In C. Carson (Ed.), Space, Place, Writing (pp. 23–56). Liverpool University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjcgf.6
Bazin, A. (2004). The Evolution of the Language of Cinema. What Is Cinema? Volume I. University of California Press.
Gregory, D. (1993). Geographical Imagination: An Introduction to Human Geography. Wiley-Blackwell.
Hodgkin, K., & Radstone, S. (Eds.). (2003). Contested pasts: The politics of memory. Routledge.
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Duke University Press.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell.
Joseph, S. (1999). Alahayude Penmakkal. Current Books.
Massey, D. (1999). Power-geometries and the politics of space-time. University of Heidelberg.
Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. Pantheon.
Murphet, J. (1999). 13. Grounding Theory: Literary Theory and the New Geography. In Post-Theory: New Directions in Criticism (pp. 200-208). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474470926-016
Nowshad, N. (2022). Madhuratheruvu. Niyatham Books.
Pampirikkunnu, P. (2017). Eri. DC Books.
Pamuk, O. (2006). Istanbul. Random House.
Ramakrishnan, E. V. (2017). Malayala Novelinte Deshakalangal. Mathrubhoomi Books.
Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. Verso.
West-Pavlov, R. (2009). Space in Theory: Kristyeva, Foucault, Deleuze. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042029132
Winkler, K., Seifert, K., & DetEring, H. (2012). Literary studies and the spatial turn. JLT Articles, 6(1). Retrieved from http://www.jltonline.de/index.php/articles/article/view/482/1215
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ISHAL PAITHRKAM

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.