Forensic Linguistics: Fields and Approaches
Keywords:
Forensic linguistics, language of the law, analytical toolkit, textual analysis, forensic discourse analysisAbstract
The present study intends to make an overview of the subject matter, fields and major approaches of forensic linguistics, a relatively new discipline introduced in the linguistics circle of Kerala. It evaluates the history and development of Forensic Linguistics, citing the milestones in the use of linguistic evidence in legal proceedings. The study introduces the major fields of forensic linguistic enquiry including author identification, forensic stylistics, discourse analysis, and forensic phonetics. Referring to the major legal cases across the globe, the study identifies some theoretical and methodological issues in using linguistics evidence in legal domains. Legal complications born out of the issue of morphological meaning, phonemic similarity, syntactic complexities, grammatical and lexical ambiguity, pragmatic meaning, and idiolect are discussed in detail citing the relevant cases in this field, and using the living examples in the context of Malayalam language. As an emerging discipline the academic and professional scope of forensic linguistics in Kerala is also discussed in this study.
Downloads
References
Brazil, D.C. (1985) The Communicative Value of Intonation, Birmingham: English Language Research.
Broeders, A.P.A. and Rietveld, A.C.M. (1995) ‘Speaker identifi cation by earwitnesses’, in A. Braun and J.-P. Köster (eds) Studies in Forensic Phonetics, Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 24–40.
French, J.P. (1994) ‘An overview of forensic phonetics’, Forensic Linguistics, 1, ii, 169–81
Grice, H.P. (1975). “Logic and Conversation,” Syntax and Semantics, vol.3 edited by P. Cole and J. Morgan, Academic Press. Reprinted as ch.2 of Grice 1989, 22–40.
Jan Svartvik. (1968). The Evans statement: a case of forensic linguistics. Gotenberg: University of Gotenberg
Kaplan, J.P., Green G.M., Cunningham, C.D. and Levi J.N. (1995) ‘Bringing linguistics into judicial decision making: semantic analysis submitted to the US Supreme Court’, Forensic Linguistics, 2, i, 81–98.
Levi, J.N. (1993) Language as evidence: the linguist as expert witness in North American Courts. Forensic Linguistics, 1, i, 1–26.
Malcom Coulthard and Alison Johnson. (2007). An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. London: Routledge
Philbrick, F.A. (1949) Language and the Law: The semantics of forensic English, New York: Macmillan
Roy Monsefi. (2012). Language in Criminal Justice: Forensic Linguistics in Shipman trail. International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse 2 (2), 43-69
Shuy, (1993) Language Crimes: the use and abuse of language evidence in the courtroom, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ISHAL PAITHRKAM

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.