British Diplomatic History in Indian Princely States: Hyderabad, Kashmir and Tanjavore
Keywords:
Diplomacy, Diplomatic history, British, Princely states, Sovereignty, Hyderabad, Kashmir, TanjavoreAbstract
Although a multitude of philosophers have researched British diplomacy over the years, the element of British colonial diplomacy in India remains unexplored. The research on British policy in princely states in India is also marginal. This paper aims to analyse the historiography of British diplomacy in India during colonial rule, focusing on princely states as the unit of diplomacy. The paper extensively scrutinizes the British diplomacy and administration of three princely states: Hyderabad, Tanjavore, and Kashmir. Hyderabad was one of the most prominent princely states or a Mohammedan state in India, which had a unique semi-autonomous status compared to the rest, providing details of diplomatic relations with the British. In contrast, Tanjavore and Kashmir are two small princely states affected by domestic and international conflicts, leading them to be more constrained under British rule. This study concludes that the British diplomatic strategies varied significantly based on the political importance and internal conditions of each state. The methodology utilized in this research is an archival analysis of alliances, treaties, and interactions between the princely states and the British. Overall, the study provides a more nuanced understanding of colonial governance by highlighting the differentiated and pragmatic nature of British diplomacy in India.
Downloads
References
Amirell Stefan Eklöf. (2022). New Diplomatic History and the Study of the Global Nineteenth Century. Global Nineteenth-Century Studies, 1(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.3828/gncs.2022.6
Ankit, R. (2013). Great Britain and Kashmir, 1947–49. India Review, 12(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14736489.2013.759467
Ashton, S.R. (1982). British Policy Towards the Indian States 1905–1939 (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003368243
Bayly, C. A., editor. (1990). The Raj: India and the British, 1600-1947. London: National Portrait Gallery Publications
Beverley, E. L. (2015). Hyderabad, British India, and the World: Muslim Networks and Minor Sovereignty, c.1850–1950. undefined. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316118665
Gardiner, J. (Ed.). (1988). What is History Today …? Macmillan Education UK https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19161-1
Groenhout, F. (2006). The History of the Indian Princely States: Bringing the Puppets Back onto Centre Stage. History Compass, 4(4), 629–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1478-0542.2006.00338.X
Hassnain, F. M. (1974). British policy towards Kashmir, 1846-1921: Kashmir in Anglo-Russian politics. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.
Hansen, T. B. (2021). Sovereignty in a Minor Key. undefined, 33(1).https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-8742160
Hutten back, R. A. (2004). Kashmir and the British Raj 1847-1947. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA76242725
K Rajayyan (1969), A History of British Diplomacy in Tanjore. Rao &Raghavan Publishers.
Purushottam, S. (2020). Federating the Raj: Hyderabad, sovereign kingship, and partition. Modern Asian Studies, 54(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0026749x17000981
Ray, B. (1988). Hyderabad and British Paramountcy 1858-1883. Oxford University Press.
Saksena, P. (2023). Sovereignty, International Law, and the Princely States of Colonial South India Asia. Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192866585.001.0001
Sharma, Hari (1978), Princes and Paramountcy. Arnold Heinemann Publishers.
Segura-Garcia, T. (2022). The Indian Princely States in the Global Nineteenth Century. Global Nineteenth-Century Studies, 1(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.3828/gncs.2022.14
Warner, S.W.L. (1910), The Native States of India. Macmillan And Co., Limited.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ISHAL PAITHRKAM

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.