Religious Perspectives on the Conceptions of Disability

Authors

  • Liju T Varghese Department of Oriental Languages (Malayalam), St.Stephen’s College Pathanapuram, Pin: 689695, India Author

Keywords:

Disability, Religion, Normalcy, Identity, Culture, Body

Abstract

The influence of religion on the human worldview is beyond definition. The value systems, belief doctrines, and ritual practices of religions have, through the process of social construction, determined the position of the human being in the world. Contemporary society’s perspectives and attitudes toward disability often trace their origins to the deeper recesses of collective consciousness. An inquiry into this collective consciousness frequently leads to religious traditions and teachings.Disability is a term that has undergone numerous transformations. Often referred to solely in terms of deficiency or defined by limitations, disability is a concept that has been nurtured within the cultural framework of diverse perspectives. Humanistic studies demonstrate that interventions and understandings around disability have been shaped within such varied cultural constructs.What is the underlying reason for the formation of such perspectives in society? Disability has been marked in different periods of public consciousness through religious and cultural influences. The role of persons with disabilities within the structure of society is unique. Through religious, historical, and literary representations of disability, its moral legitimacy and sense of justice have long been questioned. Any approach to studying social and cultural discrimination remains critically relevant. The objective of this study is to examine the discriminatory configurations present in conceptions of disability within the religions of India. Social attitudes toward persons with physical and mental differences are generally bound by tradition. In earlier times, disability was confined to narrow interpretations shaped by religious beliefs, medical discourses, and existential conditions. Today, however, disability has begun to be recognized as a socio-political and cultural construct, gaining renewed attention across the globe. Philosophical streams and lived experiences related to history, culture, religion, society, and literature deeply influence the shaping of identity. Through these influences, disability is often misunderstood or misrepresented, and its contextual analysis is neglected. The religious foundations that have led to the marginalization of persons with disabilities from the social mainstream need to be examined. Religions and religious texts have played a significant role in shaping the societal notions about disability. The religious discourses in India offer a wide range of perspectives on the concept of disability. This study aims to critically analyse the diversity and complexity raised by religious consciousness in the conception of disability, within the context of social construction, identity, and the dominant notion of normalcy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, A. Y. (1992). The meaning of the Holy Qur’an. Amana Publications.

Achyuthan, Mavelikkara. (2024). Sanskrit–Malayalam Dictionary. Prashanthi Publications.

Avalos, H. (1995). Illness and health care in the ancient Near East: The role of the temple in Greece, Mesopotamia, and Israel. Harvard Theological Review, 88(2), 301–322.

Bible. (2011). New International Version. Biblica, Inc.

Bruckner, J. K. (2003). Implied law in the Abraham narrative: A literary and theological analysis. Sheffield Academic Press.

Charlton, J. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. University of California Press.

Chok, Rinpoche. (2005, September 26). Lam Rim teaching series [Oral teaching]. All Souls Church, New York. *Disability Studies Quarterly*. [https://dsq-sds.org/index.php/dsq/article/view/723/900](https://dsq-sds.org/index.php/dsq/article/view/723/900)

Covey, H. C. (1998). Social perceptions of people with disabilities in history. Charles C Thomas.

Davis, L. J. (2017). Constructing normalcy: The Bell Curve, the novel, and the invention of the disabled body in the nineteenth century. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (5th ed., pp. 3–16). Routledge.

Durkheim, É. (1964). The rules of sociological method (S. A. Solovay & J. H. Mueller, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1895)

Durkheim, É. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life (K. E. Fields, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1912)

Eiesland, N. L. (1994). The disabled God: Toward a liberatory theology of disability. Abingdon Press.

Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton & Company.

Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published 1975)

Guru Granth Sahib Ji. (1997). Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji (G. Singh, Trans.). World Sikh Center Inc.

Marx, K. (1970). Contribution to the critique of Hegel’s philosophy of right: Introduction (J. O’Malley, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.

Miles, M. (2008). Disability in an Islamic context: Theology, law, and history. Disability Studies Quarterly, 28 (4). [https://dsq-sds.org/article/view/105/105](https://dsq-sds.org/article/view/105/105)

Muraleedharan, Nellikkal. (2011). Perspectives in World Literature [Vishwasahithya Darshanangal]. DC Books.

Neusner, J. (2006). The Talmud: What it is and what it says. Rowman & Littlefield.

Oxford English Dictionary. (1989). Identity (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. [https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/91011](https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/91011)

Padmanabhapilla, Sreekanteswaram G. (2013). Shabdatharavali [Malayalam Dictionary]. Sahitya Pravarthaka Cooperative Society and National Book Stall.

Pandey, R. S., & Advani, L. (1995). Perspective in disability and rehabilitation. Vikas Publishing House.

Pabongka Rinpoche. (1990). Liberation in our hands (M. Richards, Trans.). Mahayana Sutra and Tantra Press.

Ranjith, V. (2024–2025). Disability, capacity discourse and public perception [Bhinnasheshiyum Sheshivada Kashyapadavum Pothubodha Nirmithiyum]. Malayalapacha: A Peer Reviewed UGC Care Listed Research Journal of Language, Literature and Culture*, 2(2), 146.

Richards, I. A. (1989). Principles of literary criticism. Routledge.

Rispler-Chaim, V. (2007). Disability in Islamic law. Springer.

Shabdatharavali. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation.

Tanveer, A. (2014). Disability in Islam: Insights into theology, law, history and practice. ResearchGate.

Umasvati. (1994). Tattvartha Sutra: That which is (N. Tatia, Trans.). Jain Publishing Company.

Yong, A. (2007). Theology and Down syndrome: Reimagining disability in late modernity. Baylor University Press.

Nadeer Payyoli. (2024). Disability: Spirituality and Disability [Disability Aathmeeyatayum Bhinnasheshiyum]. Kerala University Publications.

Varghese, Rev. Dr. V. S. (2023). Religions: An Introductory Study [Mathangal Oru Amukha Padanam]. TLC Thiruvalla.

Published

2026-03-30

Issue

Section

Articles