Deconstructing Anthropocentrism: A Posthumanist Analysis of M. P. Narayana Pillai's Parinaamam
Keywords:
Posthumanism, m p narayanapillai, anthropocentrism, Malayalam literature, anthropomorphism, zoomorphismAbstract
This paper examines M. P. Narayana Pillai's novel Parinamam through a posthumanist analytical framework, arguing that the work is a pioneering example of posthumanistic literature that critiques anthropocentrism and challenges the human-animal binary. While Pillai is often categorized as a modernist writer, this study demonstrates that his focus on the alienated lives of both humans and non-humans, particularly in Parinaamam, reveals a deeper engagement with posthumanist perspectives. The novel's protagonist, a dog named Tommy, is presented not as a symbolic animal but as a complex subject with his own ideology and revolutionary consciousness. By giving voice and agency to a non-human, Pillai critiques human-centric institutions—from the state to political ideologies—and exposes their hypocrisies. The paper employs analytical method to explore how Pillai's narrative blurs the lines of anthropomorphism and zoomorphism, ultimately envisioning a ‘zoopolis’ where animals are regarded as co-beings with inherent political and moral rights. In conclusion, this research asserts that Parinaamam is a seminal work that anticipates contemporary posthumanist thought by decentering the human and asking fundamental questions about our relationship with other species.
Downloads
References
Calarco, M. (2008). Zoographies: The question of the animal from Heidegger to Derrida. Columbia University Press.
Cottrell, P. (2016). Philosophy of humanism, transhumanism and posthumanism. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2761543
George, J. (2025, May 19). M. P. Narayana Pillai: Moulika bhavanakalilekulla parinaamam (trans. M. P. Narayana Pillai: An evolution towards rudimentary imaginations). The Cue. https://www.thecue.in/opinion/memoir/mp-narayana-pillai-memorial-note
Graham, E. (2004). Post/human conditions. Theology & Sexuality, 10, 10–32.
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
Nayar, P. K. (2014). Posthumanism. Polity Press.
Onishi, B. B. (2010). Information, bodies, and Heidegger: Tracing visions of the posthuman. Sophia, 49(1), 101–112.
Pillai, M. P. (1989). Parinaamam [Evolution]. D. C. Books.
Sorgner, R. R. (2014). Post- and transhumanism: An introduction. Springer.
Kymlicka, W., & Donaldson, S. (2011). Zoopolis: A political theory of animal rights. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ISHAL PAITHRKAM

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.